AUGUSTA, Ga. – Augusta’s leaders are grappling with the delicate balance of preserving the city’s historic buildings while addressing concerns about fairness in the process. As Georgia’s second oldest city, Augusta is home to a wealth of historical structures, and city officials are determined to safeguard these landmarks. However, recent controversies, particularly surrounding the historic First Baptist Church, have raised questions about the city’s approach to historic preservation.

The First Baptist Church, a key part of Augusta’s rich history, became the center of debate after the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) cited the building’s owner for code violations. The action sparked backlash from some local leaders, prompting calls for changes in the way the commission operates.

Mayor Garnett Johnson, who has been a strong advocate for historic preservation, emphasized the importance of protecting Augusta’s past. “It’s important to save as many buildings and structures that we possibly can that tell our rich history,” he said.

In response to the controversy, commissioners held a work session on Wednesday to review the ordinance governing the HPC. While some of the disagreement is attributed to strong personalities both on the commission and among property owners, Commissioner Tina Slendak expressed that the issue may not lie with the ordinance itself but with how it’s enforced. “I don’t think there’s a lot wrong with the ordinance,” Slendak stated.

One of the main points of contention is the appeal process. Under the current ordinance, property owners must pay for a mediator if they wish to appeal the HPC’s ruling. This requirement has been a source of frustration for some property owners, who argue that it creates an unnecessary financial burden.

Commissioner Catherine Smith Rice suggested a revision to the process, proposing that commissioners themselves be allowed to hear appeals instead of requiring property owners to hire an attorney. “Applicants have to go and hire an attorney, at least let us have the chance to listen to it,” Rice said.

Another potential change is to provide additional training for members of the HPC, ensuring they are better equipped to make informed decisions about historic properties. Dave Barbee, chair of the HPC, clarified that any changes to the ordinance would be determined by the commission itself.

As Augusta continues to grow and evolve, the debate over historic preservation versus fairness in regulatory practices is likely to remain a topic of discussion. While city leaders remain committed to protecting Augusta’s heritage, it remains to be seen how the commission will address concerns over the preservation process to ensure both the city’s history and its residents are treated fairly.